static int ethtool_get_eee(struct net_device *dev, char __user *useraddr)
{
- struct ethtool_keee edata;
+ struct ethtool_keee keee;
+ struct ethtool_eee eee;
int rc;
if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_eee)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- memset(&edata, 0, sizeof(struct ethtool_keee));
- edata.cmd = ETHTOOL_GEEE;
- rc = dev->ethtool_ops->get_eee(dev, &edata);
With the old code, the edata passed to the driver has edata.cmd set to
ETHTOOL_GEEE.
-
+ memset(&keee, 0, sizeof(keee));
+ rc = dev->ethtool_ops->get_eee(dev, &keee);
Here, its not set. I don't know if it makes a difference, if any
driver actually looks at it. If you reviewed all the drivers and think
this is O.K, i would suggest a comment in the commit message
explaining this.
Andrew