Hi Andrew,

Sorry I forgot to reply to that one...

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:58:30 +0100
Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:

quoted

PSE and PD configuration is a PHY-specific command. Instead of targeting
the command towards dev->phydev, use the request to pick the targeted
PHY device.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
V4: No changes
V3: No changes
V2: New patch

 net/ethtool/pse-pd.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ethtool/pse-pd.c b/net/ethtool/pse-pd.c
index cc478af77111..0d9cd9c87104 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/pse-pd.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/pse-pd.c

@@ -31,17 +31,10 @@ const struct nla_policy ethnl_pse_get_policy[ETHTOOL_A_PSE_HEADER + 1] = {
 	[ETHTOOL_A_PSE_HEADER] = NLA_POLICY_NESTED(ethnl_header_policy),
 };
 
-static int pse_get_pse_attributes(struct net_device *dev,
+static int pse_get_pse_attributes(struct phy_device *phydev,
 				  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
 				  struct pse_reply_data *data)
 {
-	struct phy_device *phydev = dev->phydev;
-
-	if (!phydev) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "No PHY is attached");
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-  

It would be good to say in the commit message why it is safe to remove
this.

That's a good catch, this removal is wrong and will be put back in the
next iteration.

quoted

@@ -132,7 +124,7 @@ ethnl_set_pse(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info, struct genl_info *info)
 	/* this values are already validated by the ethnl_pse_set_policy */
 	config.admin_cotrol = nla_get_u32(tb[ETHTOOL_A_PODL_PSE_ADMIN_CONTROL]);
 
-	phydev = dev->phydev;
+	phydev = req_info->phydev;
 	if (!phydev) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, "No PHY is attached");
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;  

So you removed one test, but this one stays?

Thanks for the review,

Maxime