Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 05/11] net: ethernet: am65-cpsw: cleanup TAPRIO handling
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2023-12-14 11:24:22
Also in:
lkml
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: 2023-12-14 11:24:22
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:07:15PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
+static int am65_cpsw_taprio_replace(struct net_device *ndev,
+ struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *taprio)
{
struct am65_cpsw_common *common = am65_ndev_to_common(ndev);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = taprio->mqprio.extack;
+ struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
struct am65_cpts *cpts = common->cpts;
- int ret = 0, tact = TACT_PROG;
+ struct am65_cpsw_est *est_new;
+ int ret, tact;
- am65_cpsw_est_update_state(ndev);
+ if (!netif_running(ndev)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "interface is down, link speed unknown");
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+ }I haven't used the runtime PM API that this driver uses. I don't know much about how it works. What are the rules here? By checking for netif_running(), are you intending to rely on the pm_runtime_resume_and_get() call from ndo_open(), which is released with pm_runtime_put() at ndo_stop() time? I see some inconsistencies I don't quite understand. am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_add_vid() checks for netif_running() then calls pm_runtime_resume_and_get() anyway. am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio() allows changing the offload even when the link is down (which is more user-friendly anyway) and performs the pm_runtime_get_sync() call itself.
-}