Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2023-12-13

RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] octeon_ep: PF-VF mailbox version support

flat view

From: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
Date: 2023-12-11 10:31:46
Also in: lkml

Hi Leon,
quoted
@@ -28,10 +28,18 @@ static void octep_pfvf_validate_version(struct
octep_device *oct,  u32 vf_id,
quoted
 {
 	u32 vf_version = (u32)cmd.s_version.version;

-	if (vf_version <= OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_V1)
-		rsp->s_version.type = OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_TYPE_RSP_ACK;
+	dev_dbg(&oct->pdev->dev, "VF id:%d VF version:%d PF
version:%d\n",
quoted
+		vf_id, vf_version, OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_CURRENT);
+	if (vf_version < OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_CURRENT)
+		rsp->s_version.version = vf_version;
 	else
-		rsp->s_version.type = OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_TYPE_RSP_NACK;
+		rsp->s_version.version =
OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_CURRENT;
quoted
+
+	oct->vf_info[vf_id].mbox_version = rsp->s_version.version;
+	dev_dbg(&oct->pdev->dev, "VF id:%d negotiated VF version:%d\n",
+		vf_id, oct->vf_info[vf_id].mbox_version);
+
+	rsp->s_version.type = OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_TYPE_RSP_ACK;
 }
<...>
quoted
+#define OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_CURRENT
	OCTEP_PFVF_MBOX_VERSION_V1

This architecture design is unlikely to work in the real world unless
you control both PF and VF environment. Mostly PF is running some old
legacy distribution while VFs run more modern OS and this check will
prevent to run new driver in VF.

Thanks
Thanks for the review. This version validation only concerns regarding the control net API layer (which is used to communicate with
the firmware). In the case you have described, this instead enables new VF drivers to atleast work atop legacy PF drivers (note legacy here still
refers to PF drivers which support this backward compatibility), although they might not be able to use the latest control net functionalities that they
have been enabled for.

In the absence of such a backward compatibility, VF drivers would issue control net requests which PF drivers wouldn't know, only leading to logs of
incompatibility errors and erroneous usage. 

Also again please note that this version compatibility only concerns the control net infrastructure and API (the control plane).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help