Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: phy: Introduce ethernet link topology representation
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Date: 2023-11-23 13:34:21
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hello Andrew, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:24:47 +0100 Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+int link_topo_add_phy(struct link_topology *lt, struct phy_device *phy, + enum phy_upstream upt, void *upstream) +{ + ret = xa_alloc_cyclic(<->phys, &phy->phyindex, pdn, xa_limit_32b, + <->next_phy_index, GFP_KERNEL); + if (ret) + goto err; + + return 0;It looks like that could be just return xa_alloc_cyclic(...);
Indeed, nice catch
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/link_topology.h b/include/linux/link_topology.hI think this filename is too generic. Maybe phy_link_topology.h, or move it into include/net.quoted
+struct phy_device *link_topo_get_phy(struct link_topology *lt, int phyindex); +int link_topo_add_phy(struct link_topology *lt, struct phy_device *phy, + enum phy_upstream upt, void *upstream); + +void link_topo_del_phy(struct link_topology *lt, struct phy_device *phy);What is the locking for these functions? Are you assuming RTNL? Maybe add ASSERT_RTNL(); into them to make this clear.
Indeed I assume it, I'll add an assert and document that clearly then.
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/link_topology_core.h b/include/linux/link_topology_core.hAgain, i think this filename is too generic.quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index a16c9cc063fe..7021a0d3d982 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include <net/dcbnl.h> #endif #include <net/netprio_cgroup.h> - #include <linux/netdev_features.h>Whitespace change.quoted
#include <linux/neighbour.h> #include <uapi/linux/netdevice.h>@@ -52,6 +51,7 @@ #include <net/net_trackers.h> #include <net/net_debug.h> #include <net/dropreason-core.h> +#include <linux/link_topology_core.h> struct netpoll_info; struct device;@@ -2405,6 +2405,7 @@ struct net_device { #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_NET_PRIO) struct netprio_map __rcu *priomap; #endif + struct link_topology link_topo; struct phy_device *phydev; struct sfp_bus *sfp_bus; struct lock_class_key *qdisc_tx_busylock;diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h index 3cc52826f18e..d698180b1df0 100644 --- a/include/linux/phy.h +++ b/include/linux/phy.h@@ -543,6 +543,8 @@ struct macsec_ops; * @drv: Pointer to the driver for this PHY instance * @devlink: Create a link between phy dev and mac dev, if the external phy * used by current mac interface is managed by another mac interface. + * @phyindex: Unique id across the phy's parent tree of phys to address the PHY + * from userspace, similar to ifindex. It's never recycled. * @phy_id: UID for this device found during discovery * @c45_ids: 802.3-c45 Device Identifiers if is_c45. * @is_c45: Set to true if this PHY uses clause 45 addressing.@@ -640,6 +642,7 @@ struct phy_device { struct device_link *devlink; + int phyindex;Is this int, or unsigned int? Is a negative value possible and legal?
You're right this should be unsigned. I've also missed properly documenting correct values and their meaning (like phyindex 0 would be no index assigned).
quoted
+enum phy_upstream { + PHY_UPSTREAM_MAC, + PHY_UPSTREAM_SFP, + PHY_UPSTREAM_PHY, +};Please document what these actually mean.
I'll do this as well. Thank you for reviewing, Maxime
Andrew