Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] can: m_can: Optimizations for m_can/tcan part 2
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2023-11-13 20:51:18
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2023-11-13 20:51:18
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:31:20PM +0100, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 14:30 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 13.11.2023 14:25:37, Martin Hundebøll wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 16:12 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:quoted
Hi Marc, Simon, Martin and everyone, v6 is a rebase on v6.6. As there was a conflicting change merged for v6.6 which introduced irq polling, I had to modify the patches that touch the hrtimer. @Simon: I removed a couple of your reviewed-by tags because of the changes. @Martin: as the functionality changed, I did not apply your Tested-by tag as I may have introduced new bugs with the changes. The series implements many small and bigger throughput improvements and adds rx/tx coalescing at the end. Based on v6.6-rc2. Also available at https://gitlab.baylibre.com/msp8/linux/-/tree/topic/mcan-optimization/v6.6?ref_type=headsFor the whole series: Tested-by: Martin Hundebøll <redacted>On which hardware? On an mmio mapped m_can or the tcan4x5x?tcan4x5x on a custom iMX6UL. Sorry for mentioning it.
Thanks for testing! Also I was able to get my hands on an am62 board and could test the series on a mmio mapped m_can (in loopback mode). I didn't notice any issues. Best, Markus