Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2023-11-13

Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] can: m_can: Optimizations for m_can/tcan part 2

From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2023-11-13 20:51:18
Also in: linux-can, lkml

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 02:31:20PM +0100, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 14:30 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
On 13.11.2023 14:25:37, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 16:12 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
quoted
Hi Marc, Simon, Martin and everyone,

v6 is a rebase on v6.6. As there was a conflicting change merged
for
v6.6 which introduced irq polling, I had to modify the patches
that
touch the hrtimer.

@Simon: I removed a couple of your reviewed-by tags because of
the
changes.

@Martin: as the functionality changed, I did not apply your
Tested-by
tag as I may have introduced new bugs with the changes.

The series implements many small and bigger throughput
improvements
and
adds rx/tx coalescing at the end.

Based on v6.6-rc2. Also available at
https://gitlab.baylibre.com/msp8/linux/-/tree/topic/mcan-optimization/v6.6?ref_type=heads
For the whole series:
Tested-by: Martin Hundebøll <redacted>
On which hardware? On an mmio mapped m_can or the tcan4x5x?
tcan4x5x on a custom iMX6UL.

Sorry for mentioning it.
Thanks for testing!

Also I was able to get my hands on an am62 board and could test the
series on a mmio mapped m_can (in loopback mode). I didn't notice any
issues.

Best,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help