Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-30 07:31:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-riscv, lkml
On 29/10/2023 23:15, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
On 10/29/23 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:quoted
The Synopsys DesignWare MAC found on StarFive JH7100 SoC is quite similar to the newer JH7110, but it requires only two interrupts and a single reset line. Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 1 + .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml index a4d7172ea701..c1380ff1c054 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ properties: - snps,dwmac-5.20 - snps,dwxgmac - snps,dwxgmac-2.10 + - starfive,jh7100-dwmac - starfive,jh7110-dwmac reg:diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml index 44e58755a5a2..70e35a3401f4 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml@@ -13,10 +13,14 @@ maintainers: properties: compatible: - items: - - enum: - - starfive,jh7110-dwmac - - const: snps,dwmac-5.20 + oneOf: + - items: + - const: starfive,jh7100-dwmac + - const: snps,dwmac + - items: + - enum: + - starfive,jh7110-dwmac + - const: snps,dwmac-5.20Why do you use different fallback?AFAIK, dwmac-5.20 is currently only used by JH7110.
What is used by JH7000?
quoted
quoted
reg: maxItems: 1@@ -37,23 +41,6 @@ properties: - const: tx - const: gtx - interrupts: - minItems: 3 - maxItems: 3 - - interrupt-names: - minItems: 3 - maxItems: 3 - - resets: - minItems: 2 - maxItems: 2You just changed it in previous patches... So the previous code allowing one item was correct?I mentioned the possible use-cases in the previous email. So yes, JH7110 requires 2 resets, while JH7100 just one.
Your previous patch does not make sense now... Best regards, Krzysztof