Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/5] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx add MACsec support
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2023-08-30 19:14:39
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 03:50:06PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static bool nxp_c45_rx_sc_valid(struct nxp_c45_secy *phy_secy, + struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc) +{ + u16 port = (__force u64)rx_sc->sci >> (ETH_ALEN * 8);u64 sci = be64_to_cpu((__force __be64)rx_sc->sci);why is the __force needed? What happens with a normal cast?Sparse will print warnings if __force is missing.What is the warning? I just want to make sure __force is the correct solution, not that something has the wrong type and we should be fixing a design issue.
Hi Andrew, rx_sc->sci is sci_t, which is defined as: typedef u64 __bitwise sci_t; Sparse documentation (Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst) states that: "__bitwise" is a type attribute, so you have to do something like this:: ... which makes PM_SUSPEND and PM_RESUME "bitwise" integers (the "__force" is there because sparse will complain about casting to/from a bitwise type, but in this case we really _do_ want to force the conversion). So basically, sci is a bitwise type, which means sparse gives it special properties that ensures it can only be operated on using similarly typed integers. So, those __force casts are needed to convert sci to something else. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!