Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN

[PATCH net v1] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Lin Ma <hidden> · 2023-07-31
Re: [PATCH net v1] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> · 2023-07-31
Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2023-07-31
Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Lin Ma <hidden> · 2023-08-01
Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2023-08-01
Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN · Lin Ma <hidden> · 2023-08-01
Re: net: dcb: Communication challenges for patch reviews? · Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2023-08-01
Re: net: dcb: Communication challenges for patch reviews? · Dan Carpenter <hidden> · 2023-08-01
Re: net: dcb: Communication challenges for patch reviews? · Markus Elfring <hidden> · 2023-08-01

From: Lin Ma <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-01 01:34:42
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

Hello Markus,

…

quoted

This patch use correct dcbnl_bcn_nest policy to parse the
tb[DCB_ATTR_BCN] nested TLV.

Are imperative change descriptions still preferred?

See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.5-rc3#n94

Regards,
Markus

Yeah, thanks for reminding me. I haven't been paying attention to that and I will remember this ever since. :D

Regards,
Lin

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help