Simon reviewed the patch already.

It seems that some reviewers do not care so much about the recommended application
of imperative mood for improved change descriptions.

Don't listen to Markus.

I hope that further suggestions (including remaining patches) will get more
development attention so that the change acceptance will evolve accordingly.

He's banned from vger.

Is this historic action a questionable side effect of known recurring
communication difficulties?

How many contributors are blocked so far?

There are also participants who are still more open to some change ideas.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/2023073123-poser-panhandle-1cb7@gregkh/ (local)

I imagine that the “intelligence” can be improved also for
“the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman”.

How “nonsensical or otherwise pointless” do you find review comments
which remind requirements from the Linux development documentation
for a discussed patch?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.5-rc4#n3

Regards,
Markus