Re: [PATCH v2 24/47] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker
From: Qi Zheng <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-25 03:05:58
Also in:
dm-devel, dri-devel, kvm, linux-arm-msm, linux-bcache, linux-btrfs, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-nfs, linux-raid, linux-xfs, lkml, rcu, xen-devel
Hi Steven, On 2023/7/24 19:17, Steven Price wrote:
On 24/07/2023 10:43, Qi Zheng wrote:quoted
In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker, so that it can be freed asynchronously using kfree_rcu(). Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side critical section when releasing the struct panfrost_device. Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <redacted>One nit below, but otherwise: Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>quoted
--- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 6 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h | 2 +- .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c | 32 ++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h index b0126b9fbadc..e667e5689353 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct panfrost_device { struct mutex shrinker_lock; struct list_head shrinker_list; - struct shrinker shrinker; + struct shrinker *shrinker; struct panfrost_devfreq pfdevfreq; };diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c index bbada731bbbd..f705bbdea360 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c@@ -598,10 +598,14 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (err < 0) goto err_out1; - panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(ddev); + err = panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(ddev); + if (err) + goto err_out2; return 0; +err_out2: + drm_dev_unregister(ddev); err_out1: pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev); panfrost_device_fini(pfdev);diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h index ad2877eeeccd..863d2ec8d4f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ panfrost_gem_mapping_get(struct panfrost_gem_object *bo, void panfrost_gem_mapping_put(struct panfrost_gem_mapping *mapping); void panfrost_gem_teardown_mappings_locked(struct panfrost_gem_object *bo); -void panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev); +int panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev); void panfrost_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev); #endif /* __PANFROST_GEM_H__ */diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c index bf0170782f25..9a90dfb5301f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ static unsigned long panfrost_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc) { - struct panfrost_device *pfdev = - container_of(shrinker, struct panfrost_device, shrinker); + struct panfrost_device *pfdev = shrinker->private_data; struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; unsigned long count = 0;@@ -65,8 +64,7 @@ static bool panfrost_gem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj) static unsigned long panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc) { - struct panfrost_device *pfdev = - container_of(shrinker, struct panfrost_device, shrinker); + struct panfrost_device *pfdev = shrinker->private_data; struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem, *tmp; unsigned long freed = 0;@@ -97,13 +95,24 @@ panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc) * * This function registers and sets up the panfrost shrinker. */ -void panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev) +int panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev) { struct panfrost_device *pfdev = dev->dev_private; - pfdev->shrinker.count_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_count; - pfdev->shrinker.scan_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan; - pfdev->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; - WARN_ON(register_shrinker(&pfdev->shrinker, "drm-panfrost")); + + pfdev->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "drm-panfrost"); + if (!pfdev->shrinker) { + WARN_ON(1);I don't think this WARN_ON is particularly useful - if there's a failed memory allocation we should see output from the kernel anyway. And we're changing the semantics from "continue just without a shrinker" (which argueably justifies the warning) to "probe fails, device doesn't work" which will be obvious to the user so I don't feel we need the additional warn.
Make sense. Will delete this WARN_ON() in the next version. Thanks, Qi
quoted
+ return -ENOMEM; + } + + pfdev->shrinker->count_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_count; + pfdev->shrinker->scan_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan; + pfdev->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS; + pfdev->shrinker->private_data = pfdev; + + shrinker_register(pfdev->shrinker); + + return 0; } /**@@ -116,7 +125,6 @@ void panfrost_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev) { struct panfrost_device *pfdev = dev->dev_private; - if (pfdev->shrinker.nr_deferred) { - unregister_shrinker(&pfdev->shrinker); - } + if (pfdev->shrinker) + shrinker_unregister(pfdev->shrinker); }