Re: [PATCH docs v3] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:42:59
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:42:59
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:23:56 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
Does this apply even to "checkpatch cleanup patch spam", where other patches sprayed from the same source (perhaps against other drivers) have already been nacked as worthless churn?
For networking you can check patchwork, if it's already marked as rejected or such - there's no need to respond.
I've generally been assuming I can ignore those, do I need to make sure to explicitly respond with typically a repeat of what's already been said elsewhere?
Repeating the same thing over and over is sadly a part of being a maintainer, tho.