Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 8 authors, 2023-07-21

Re: [PATCH docs v3] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:42:59
Also in: linux-doc, lkml, workflows

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:23:56 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
Does this apply even to "checkpatch cleanup patch spam", where other patches
 sprayed from the same source (perhaps against other drivers) have already
 been nacked as worthless churn? 
For networking you can check patchwork, if it's already marked
as rejected or such - there's no need to respond.
I've generally been assuming I can ignore those, do I need to make
sure to explicitly respond with typically a repeat of what's already
been said elsewhere?
Repeating the same thing over and over is sadly a part of being
a maintainer, tho.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help