Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 8 authors, 2023-07-21

Re: [PATCH docs v3] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:37:52
Also in: linux-doc, lkml, workflows

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:15:26 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote:
..I noticed that none of these sections address actually testing the
code they're responsible for on a (semi-)regular basis. Sure, that comes
as part of reviewing the patches for their code, but changes to other
subsystems that a driver/feature maintainer probably would not have been
CCed on may cause problems for the code they maintain.
If we are adding a doc about best-practice for maintainers, I think we
should be encouraging people to test regularly.
I think our testing story is too shaky to make that a requirement.
Differently put - I was never able to get good upstream testing running
when I worked for a vendor myself so I wouldn't know how to draw 
the lines.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help