Re: [PATCH docs v3] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:37:52
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-20 21:37:52
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml, workflows
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:15:26 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote:
..I noticed that none of these sections address actually testing the code they're responsible for on a (semi-)regular basis. Sure, that comes as part of reviewing the patches for their code, but changes to other subsystems that a driver/feature maintainer probably would not have been CCed on may cause problems for the code they maintain. If we are adding a doc about best-practice for maintainers, I think we should be encouraging people to test regularly.
I think our testing story is too shaky to make that a requirement. Differently put - I was never able to get good upstream testing running when I worked for a vendor myself so I wouldn't know how to draw the lines.