Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2023-07-12

RE: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Date: 2023-07-12 09:20:13
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-clk, linux-doc, linux-rdma, lkml

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 10:15 PM

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:17:51 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
quoted
quoted
I think better to add the check to pin-register so future synce pin
users don't have similar weird ideas. Could you please add this check?
Don't think it is way to go, and I don't think there is anything good
with preventing device drivers from labeling their pins the way they
want.
We had a long argument about how label should have a clearly defined
meaning. We're not going to rehash it on every revision. What did I miss :|
Well, as I understand we are discussing if dpll subsystem shall prevent
labeling the SyncE type pins. I have labeled them in ice explicitly with
the name of a pci device they belong to.

You haven't miss much, mostly the problem is described in this thread.

Thank you!
Arkadiusz
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help