Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2023-07-12

Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2023-06-28 11:16:51
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-clk, linux-doc, linux-rdma, lkml

Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:15:11AM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
quoted
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:18 PM

Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
quoted
v8 -> v9:
Could you please address all the unresolved issues from v8 and send v10?
I'm not reviewing this one.

Thanks!
Sure, will do, but first missing to-do/discuss list:
1) remove mode_set as not used by any driver
2) remove "no-added-value" static functions descriptions in
  dpll_core/dpll_netlink
3) merge patches [ 03/10, 04/10, 05/10 ] into patches that are compiling
  after each patch apply
4) remove function return values descriptions/lists
5) Fix patch [05/10]:
  - status Supported
  - additional maintainers
  - remove callback:
    int (*source_pin_idx_get)(...) from `struct dpll_device_ops`
6) Fix patch [08/10]: rethink ice mutex locking scheme
7) Fix patch [09/10]: multiple comments on
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZIQu+%2Fo4J0ZBspVg@nanopsycho/#t (local)
8) add PPS DPLL phase offset to the netlink get-device API
You are missing removal of pin->prop.package_label = dev_name(dev); in
ice.

Thank you!
Arkadiusz
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help