Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2023-07-28
STALE1062d

[PATCH RESEND net-next 1/2] net-memcg: Scopify the indicators of sockmem pressure

From: Abel Wu <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-11 12:42:49
Also in: cgroups, linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem: control group - memory resource controller (memcg), memory management, memory management - core, the rest · Maintainers: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton, David Hildenbrand, Linus Torvalds

Now there are two indicators of socket memory pressure sit inside
struct mem_cgroup, socket_pressure and tcpmem_pressure.

When in legacy mode aka. cgroupv1, the socket memory is charged
into a separate counter memcg->tcpmem rather than ->memory, so
the reclaim pressure of the memcg has nothing to do with socket's
pressure at all. While for default mode, the ->tcpmem is simply
not used.

So {socket,tcpmem}_pressure are only used in default/legacy mode
respectively. This patch fixes the pieces of code that make mixed
use of both.

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <redacted>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 ++--
 mm/vmpressure.c            | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 5818af8eca5a..5860c7f316b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1727,8 +1727,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
 void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
-	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
-		return true;
+	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
+		return !!memcg->tcpmem_pressure;
 	do {
 		if (time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(memcg->socket_pressure)))
 			return true;
diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
index b52644771cc4..22c6689d9302 100644
--- a/mm/vmpressure.c
+++ b/mm/vmpressure.c
@@ -244,6 +244,14 @@ void vmpressure(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool tree,
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * The in-kernel users only care about the reclaim efficiency
+	 * for this @memcg rather than the whole subtree, and there
+	 * isn't and won't be any in-kernel user in a legacy cgroup.
+	 */
+	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !tree)
+		return;
+
 	vmpr = memcg_to_vmpressure(memcg);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.37.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help