Re: [PATCH] scripts: checkpatch: steer people away from using file paths
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-25 22:15:53
Also in:
workflows
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:18:15 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
@@ -544,7 +546,13 @@ foreach my $file (@ARGV) { if ($from_filename && (vcs_exists() && !vcs_file_exists($file))) { warn "$P: file '$file' not found in version control $!\n"; } - if ($from_filename || ($file ne "&STDIN" && vcs_file_exists($file))) { + if ($from_filename) { + if (!$silence_file_warning) { + warn "$P: WARNING: Prefer running the script on patches as " + . "generated by git format-patch. Selecting paths is known " + . "to miss recipients!\n";Don't separate a single output message into multiple lines. Coalesce the string elements. Also, this should show some reason why this isn't appropriate as a patch to a single file would not have this issue. e.g.: When a patch series touches multiple files, showing all maintainers is useful. see: <some process doc>
I tried to do that in --help. Added the "multiple files" one there, too.
quoted
@@ -1089,6 +1098,10 @@ version: $V --pattern-depth=0 --remove-duplicates --rolestats] Notes: + Using "-f file" is generally discouraged, running the script on a filepatch + (as generated by git format-patch) is usually the right thing to do. + Commit message is an integral part of the change and $P + will extract additional information from it (keywords, Fixes tags etc.)"filepatch" doesn't appear in the kernel at all. Use "patch file".
I got it the wrong way around. I'll use patchfile (no space) for v2 since that's what's what get_maintainer uses in two other places.