Re: [RFC 00/12] net: huge page backed page_pool
From: Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-12 11:48:38
On 2023/7/12 8:08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:49:19 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:quoted
I see you have discovered that the next bottleneck are the IOTLB misses. One of the techniques for reducing IOTLB misses is using huge pages. Called "super-pages" in article (below), and they report that this trick doesn't work on AMD (Pacifica arch). I think you have convinced me that the pp_provider idea makes sense for *this* use-case, because it feels like natural to extend PP with mitigations for IOTLB misses. (But I'm not 100% sure it fits Mina's use-case).We're on the same page then (no pun intended).quoted
What is your page refcnt strategy for these huge-pages. I assume this rely on PP frags-scheme, e.g. using page->pp_frag_count. Is this correctly understood?Oh, I split the page into individual 4k pages after DMA mapping. There's no need for the host memory to be a huge page. I mean, the actual kernel identity mapping is a huge page AFAIU, and the struct pages are allocated, anyway. We just need it to be a huge page at DMA mapping time. So the pages from the huge page provider only differ from normal alloc_page() pages by the fact that they are a part of a 1G DMA mapping.
If it is about DMA mapping, is it possible to use dma_map_sg() to enable a big continuous dma map for a lot of discontinuous 4k pages to avoid allocating big huge page? As the comment: "The scatter gather list elements are merged together (if possible) and tagged with the appropriate dma address and length." https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.16.18/source/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c#L1805