Hello Simon,
On Fri, 26 May 2023 10:39:08 +0200
Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:42:50AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
quoted
The newly introduced regmap-based MDIO driver allows for an easy
mapping of an mdiodevice onto the memory-mapped TSE PCS, which is
actually a Lynx PCS.
Convert Altera TSE to use this PCS instead of the pcs-altera-tse,
which is nothing more than a memory-mapped Lynx PCS.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
I have some concerns about the error paths in this patch.
Heh I didn't do a very good job in that regard indeed :/ I'll address
these, but I'll wait for Russell series to make it through though.
Thanks for spotting this.
...
quoted
@@ -1134,13 +1136,21 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev) const struct of_device_id *of_id = NULL;
struct altera_tse_private *priv;
struct resource *control_port;
+ struct regmap *pcs_regmap;
struct resource *dma_res;
struct resource *pcs_res;
+ struct mii_bus *pcs_bus;
struct net_device *ndev;
void __iomem *descmap;
- int pcs_reg_width = 2;
int ret = -ENODEV;
+ struct regmap_config pcs_regmap_cfg;
nit: this probably belongs in with the bunch of declarations above it.
quoted
+
+ struct mdio_regmap_config mrc = {
+ .parent = &pdev->dev,
+ .valid_addr = 0x0,
+ };
nit: maybe this too.
quoted
+
ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct altera_tse_private));
if (!ndev) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate network
device\n"); @@ -1258,10 +1268,29 @@ static int
altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret =
request_and_map(pdev, "pcs", &pcs_res, &priv->pcs_base);
if (ret) {
+ /* If we can't find a dedicated resource for the
PCS, fallback
+ * to the internal PCS, that has a different
address stride
+ */
priv->pcs_base = priv->mac_dev +
tse_csroffs(mdio_phy0);
- pcs_reg_width = 4;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 32;
+ /* Values are MDIO-like values, on 16 bits */
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(2);
+ } else {
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 16;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16;
+ pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(1);
}
+ /* Create a regmap for the PCS so that it can be used by
the PCS driver */
+ pcs_regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev,
priv->pcs_base,
+ &pcs_regmap_cfg);
+ if (IS_ERR(pcs_regmap)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_regmap);
+ goto err_free_netdev;
+ }
+ mrc.regmap = pcs_regmap;
+
/* Rx IRQ */
priv->rx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "rx_irq");
if (priv->rx_irq == -ENXIO) {@@ -1384,7 +1413,20 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev) (unsigned long) control_port->start,
priv->rx_irq, priv->tx_irq);
- priv->pcs = alt_tse_pcs_create(ndev, priv->pcs_base,
pcs_reg_width);
+ snprintf(mrc.name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-pcs-mii",
ndev->name);
+ pcs_bus = devm_mdio_regmap_register(&pdev->dev, &mrc);
+ if (IS_ERR(pcs_bus)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_bus);
+ goto err_init_phy;
+ }
+
+ priv->pcs_mdiodev = mdio_device_create(pcs_bus, 0);
mdio_device_create() can fail. Should that be handled here?
quoted
+
+ priv->pcs = lynx_pcs_create(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
+ if (!priv->pcs) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_init_phy;
Does this leak priv->pcs_mdiodev?
quoted
+ }
priv->phylink_config.dev = &ndev->dev;
priv->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
@@ -1407,11 +1449,12 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(priv->phylink)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create phylink\n");
ret = PTR_ERR(priv->phylink);
- goto err_init_phy;
+ goto err_pcs;
Does this leak priv->pcs ?
quoted
}
return 0;
-
+err_pcs:
+ mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
err_init_phy:
unregister_netdev(ndev);
err_register_netdev:
@@ -1433,6 +1476,8 @@ static int altera_tse_remove(struct
platform_device *pdev) altera_tse_mdio_destroy(ndev);
unregister_netdev(ndev);
phylink_destroy(priv->phylink);
+ mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev);
+
free_netdev(ndev);
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h index b8508f152552..679d9069846b
100644 --- a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
#ifndef MDIO_REGMAP_H
#define MDIO_REGMAP_H
+#include <linux/phy.h>
+
struct device;
struct regmap;
This hunk doesn't seem strictly related to the patch.
Perhaps the include belongs elsewhere.
Or the hunk belongs in another patch.
Indeed, I had the same issue in another patch in this series. I'll
re-split everything correctly.
Thank you for the review,
Maxime