Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro

[PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 1/8] sched: fix sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() in non-NUMA case · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 2/8] lib/find: add find_next_and_andnot_bit() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 3/8] sched/topology: introduce sched_numa_find_next_cpu() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 4/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_{,online}_cpu() macro · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 6/8] lib/cpumask: update comment to cpumask_local_spread() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 5/8] net: mlx5: switch comp_irqs_request() to using for_each_numa_cpu · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 7/8] sched: drop for_each_numa_hop_mask() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
[PATCH v3 8/8] lib: test for_each_numa_cpus() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-04-30
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] lib: test for_each_numa_cpus() · Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> · 2023-07-22
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] lib: test for_each_numa_cpus() · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-07-27
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> · 2023-05-02
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-05-02
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> · 2023-05-03
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-05-31
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2023-05-31
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro · Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> · 2023-05-31

From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-05-02 21:58:31
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

LGTM, I ran the tests on a few NUMA topologies and that all seems to behave
as expected. Thanks for working on this!

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>

Thank you Valentin. If you spent time testing the series, why
don't you add your Tested-by?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help