Re: [net-next PATCH 03/11] net: phy: Add a binding for PHY LEDs
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2023-03-08 00:54:24
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-leds, lkml
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2023-03-08 00:54:24
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-leds, lkml
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 07:00:08PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 12:17:51AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:quoted
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Define common binding parsing for all PHY drivers with LEDs using phylib. Parse the DT as part of the phy_probe and add LEDs to the linux LED class infrastructure. For the moment, provide a dummy brightness function, which will later be replaced with a call into the PHY driver. Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>Hi Christian Since you are submitting this, you need to add your own Signed-off-by: after mine.Tought it was needed only for patch where I have put any change. (case of 2 patch in this series where there was a whitespace error and had to change a binding) Think I need do to this for every other patch right?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html says: Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:’s) following the author’s SoB are from people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its development. SoB chains should reflect the real route a patch took as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author. So yes, you need to add your Signed-off-by to all my patches, independent of if you make changes or not. Andrew