On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:38:01 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:

quoted

quoted

+    Attributes:
+        type    string, kernel type of the member attribute  

We can have structs inside structs in theory, or "binary blobs" so this
is really a subset of what attr can be rather than necessarily a kernel
type?  

Okay, so the schema currently defines the member types as u*, s* and
string. Does it make sense to add 'binary' and 'struct'?

We don't have to until it's needed.

To be clear, do you want me to drop the word 'kernel' from the
docstring, or something more?

Removing kernel should be good enough