Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 2 authors, 2023-02-28

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 12/12] test/vsock: MSG_ZEROCOPY support for vsock_perf

From: Krasnov Arseniy <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-20 09:05:32
Also in: kvm, lkml

On 16.02.2023 18:29, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:06:32AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
quoted
To use this option pass '--zc' parameter:
--zerocopy or --zero-copy maybe better follow what we did with the other parameters :-)
quoted
./vsock_perf --zc --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes <bytes to send>

With this option MSG_ZEROCOPY flag will be passed to the 'send()' call.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <redacted>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
index a72520338f84..1d435be9b48e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include <poll.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <linux/errqueue.h>

#define DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES    (128 * 1024)
#define DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES    (64 * 1024)
@@ -28,9 +30,14 @@
#define BYTES_PER_GB        (1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
#define NSEC_PER_SEC        (1000000000ULL)

+#ifndef SOL_VSOCK
+#define SOL_VSOCK 287
+#endif
I thought we use the current kernel headers when we compile the tests,
do we need to fix something in the makefile?
Not sure, of course we are using uapi. But i see, that defines like SOL_XXX is not
defined in uapi headers. For example SOL_IP is defined in include/linux/socket.h,
but userspace app uses SOL_IP from in.h (at least on my machine). E.g. SOL_XXX is
not exported to user.
quoted
+
static unsigned int port = DEFAULT_PORT;
static unsigned long buf_size_bytes = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES;
static unsigned long vsock_buf_bytes = DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES;
+static bool zerocopy;

static void error(const char *s)
{
@@ -247,15 +254,74 @@ static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes)
    close(fd);
}

+static void recv_completion(int fd)
+{
+    struct sock_extended_err *serr;
+    char cmsg_data[128];
+    struct cmsghdr *cm;
+    struct msghdr msg;
+    int ret;
+
+    msg.msg_control = cmsg_data;
+    msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cmsg_data);
+
+    ret = recvmsg(fd, &msg, MSG_ERRQUEUE);
+    if (ret == -1)
+        return;
+
+    cm = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
+    if (!cm) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: no cmsg\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (cm->cmsg_level != SOL_VSOCK) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: unexpected 'cmsg_level'\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (cm->cmsg_type) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: unexpected 'cmsg_type'\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    serr = (void *)CMSG_DATA(cm);
+    if (serr->ee_origin != SO_EE_ORIGIN_ZEROCOPY) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "serr: wrong origin\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (serr->ee_errno) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "serr: wrong error code\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (zerocopy && (serr->ee_code & SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED))
+        fprintf(stderr, "warning: copy instead of zerocopy\n");
+}
+
+static void enable_so_zerocopy(int fd)
+{
+    int val = 1;
+
+    if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, &val, sizeof(val)))
+        error("setsockopt(SO_ZEROCOPY)");
+}
+
static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes)
{
    time_t tx_begin_ns;
    time_t tx_total_ns;
    size_t total_send;
+    time_t time_in_send;
    void *data;
    int fd;

-    printf("Run as sender\n");
+    if (zerocopy)
+        printf("Run as sender MSG_ZEROCOPY\n");
+    else
+        printf("Run as sender\n");
+
    printf("Connect to %i:%u\n", peer_cid, port);
    printf("Send %lu bytes\n", to_send_bytes);
    printf("TX buffer %lu bytes\n", buf_size_bytes);
@@ -265,25 +331,58 @@ static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes)
    if (fd < 0)
        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

-    data = malloc(buf_size_bytes);
+    if (zerocopy) {
+        enable_so_zerocopy(fd);

-    if (!data) {
-        fprintf(stderr, "'malloc()' failed\n");
-        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+        data = mmap(NULL, buf_size_bytes, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+                MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+        if (data == MAP_FAILED) {
+            perror("mmap");
+            exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+        }
+    } else {
+        data = malloc(buf_size_bytes);
+
+        if (!data) {
+            fprintf(stderr, "'malloc()' failed\n");
+            exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+        }
    }
Eventually to simplify the code I think we can use the mmaped buffer in
both cases.
quoted
    memset(data, 0, buf_size_bytes);
    total_send = 0;
+    time_in_send = 0;
    tx_begin_ns = current_nsec();

    while (total_send < to_send_bytes) {
        ssize_t sent;
+        size_t rest_bytes;
+        time_t before;
+
+        rest_bytes = to_send_bytes - total_send;

-        sent = write(fd, data, buf_size_bytes);
+        before = current_nsec();
+        sent = send(fd, data, (rest_bytes > buf_size_bytes) ?
+                buf_size_bytes : rest_bytes,
+                zerocopy ? MSG_ZEROCOPY : 0);
+        time_in_send += (current_nsec() - before);

        if (sent <= 0)
            error("write");

+        if (zerocopy) {
+            struct pollfd fds = { 0 };
+
+            fds.fd = fd;
Which event are we waiting for here?
quoted
+
+            if (poll(&fds, 1, -1) < 0) {
+                perror("poll");
+                exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+            }
We need this because we use only one buffer, but if we use more than
one, we could take full advantage of zerocopy, right?

Otherwise, I don't think it's a fair comparison with non-zerocopy.
Yes or course, in next versions i'll update this test for using
more long iovs.
Thanks,
Stefano
quoted
+
+            recv_completion(fd);
+        }
+
        total_send += sent;
    }
@@ -294,9 +393,14 @@ static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes)
           get_gbps(total_send * 8, tx_total_ns));
    printf("total time in 'write()': %f sec\n",
           (float)tx_total_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC);
+    printf("time in send %f\n", (float)time_in_send / NSEC_PER_SEC);

    close(fd);
-    free(data);
+
+    if (zerocopy)
+        munmap(data, buf_size_bytes);
+    else
+        free(data);
}

static const char optstring[] = "";
@@ -336,6 +440,11 @@ static const struct option longopts[] = {
        .has_arg = required_argument,
        .val = 'R',
    },
+    {
+        .name = "zc",
+        .has_arg = no_argument,
+        .val = 'Z',
+    },
    {},
};
@@ -351,6 +460,7 @@ static void usage(void)
           "  --help            This message\n"
           "  --sender   <cid>        Sender mode (receiver default)\n"
           "                                <cid> of the receiver to connect to\n"
+           "  --zc                Enable zerocopy\n"
           "  --port     <port>        Port (default %d)\n"
           "  --bytes    <bytes>KMG        Bytes to send (default %d)\n"
           "  --buf-size <bytes>KMG        Data buffer size (default %d). In sender mode\n"
@@ -413,6 +523,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
        case 'H': /* Help. */
            usage();
            break;
+        case 'Z': /* Zerocopy. */
+            zerocopy = true;
+            break;
        default:
            usage();
        }
-- 
2.25.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help