Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] dt-bindings: net: Add Motorcomm yt8xxx ethernet phy
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2023-01-30 14:03:48
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:35:35PM +0800, Frank Sae wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a YAML binding document for the Motorcom yt8xxx Ethernet phy driver. Signed-off-by: Frank Sae <Frank.Sae@motor-comm.com> --- .../bindings/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml | 102 ++++++++++++++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 + MAINTAINERS | 1 + 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yamldiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8527576c15b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: MotorComm yt8xxx Ethernet PHY + +maintainers: + - frank sae <frank.sae@motor-comm.com> + +allOf: + - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml# + +properties: + rx-internal-delay-ps: + description: | + RGMII RX Clock Delay used only when PHY operates in RGMII mode with + internal delay (phy-mode is 'rgmii-id' or 'rgmii-rxid') in pico-seconds. + enum: [ 0, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, 900, 1050, 1200, 1350, 1500, 1650, + 1800, 1900, 1950, 2050, 2100, 2200, 2250, 2350, 2500, 2650, 2800, + 2950, 3100, 3250, 3400, 3550, 3700, 3850, 4000, 4150 ] + default: 1950
Ah! There has been a misunderstand. Yes, this changes does make sense, but ....
+ + tx-internal-delay-ps: + description: | + RGMII TX Clock Delay used only when PHY operates in RGMII mode with + internal delay (phy-mode is 'rgmii-id' or 'rgmii-txid') in pico-seconds. + enum: [ 0, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, 900, 1050, 1200, 1350, 1500, 1650, 1800, + 1950, 2100, 2250 ] + default: 150
... i was actually trying to say this 150 is odd. Why is this not 1950? Andrew