On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:03 AM Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:40:27PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:

quoted

+/* Kernel parameters like nohz_full and isolcpus allow passing cpu numbers
+ * for disabling housekeeping types.
+ *
+ * The functions bellow work the opposite way, by referencing which cpus
+ * are able to perform the housekeeping type in parameter.
+ */

So checkpatch should have bitten your head off for this drug-indiced
comment style :-)

Oh, my bad on this one, I will fix that now.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com/ (local)

Any comments in the text? Is that correct?

Thanks for the feedback!

Best regards,
Leo