Hi Jakub,

Thank you for your reply!

From: Jakub Kicinski, Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 10:07 AM

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:

quoted

I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide:
1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or
   change multiple subsystems in a patch.
2) Convenient for review.

This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use
treewide for the 1) only?

I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree.
If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches
as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong.

Using RFC is reasonable, I think. I'll use this at next time. Thanks!

My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making)
was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get
posted separately.

I'll separate patches for the networking driver on v3 patch.

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda