On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:

I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide:
1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or
   change multiple subsystems in a patch.
2) Convenient for review.

This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use
treewide for the 1) only?

I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree.
If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches
as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong.

My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making)
was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get
posted separately.