On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 04:29:43PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:

On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 09:22:56AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

If I'm reading

https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAL_JsqKZ6cEny_xD8LUMQUR6AQ0q7JKZMmdP-9MUZxzzNxZ3JQ@mail.gmail.com/ (local)

correctly - the warnings are expected but there needs to be a change 
to properties, so CR? (FWIW I'd lean towards allowing it still, even
tho net-next got closed. Assuming v2 can get posted and acked today.)

I can post the v2 of this patch today with Rob's indications and the
correct indentation spotted by yamllint. I'm not going to fix the newly
introduced warnings in drivers' examples - I don't know how, for one thing,
that's hardware specific knowledge.

Sorry, but we can't have a bunch of warnings added. The examples must be 
warning free.

Rob, given that you've said DSA shouldn't validate the DT and then
reconsidered, I'd appreciate if you could leave some acks on patches 1
and 4 of that series, which deal with the kernel side of things, rather
than the dt-schema.