Le 29/06/2022 à 09:23, Uwe Kleine-König a écrit :
Hello,
[I dropped nearly all individuals from the Cc: list because various
bounces reported to be unhappy about the long (logical) line.]
Good idea, even patchwork made a mess of it, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220628140313.74984-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 03:03:54PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
quoted
Looks good - just one minor change for the mctp-i2c driver, but only
worthwhile if you end up re-rolling this series for other reasons:
quoted
-static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+static void mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct mctp_i2c_client *mcli = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
struct mctp_i2c_dev *midev = NULL, *tmp = NULL;@@ -1000,7 +1000,6 @@ static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
mctp_i2c_free_client(mcli);
mutex_unlock(&driver_clients_lock);
/* Callers ignore return code */
- return 0;
}
The comment there no longer makes much sense, I'd suggest removing that
too.
Yeah, that was already pointed out to me in a private reply. It's
already fixed in
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/ukl/linux/log/?h=i2c-remove-void
quoted
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Added to my tree, too.
Thanks
Uwe