Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 6 authors, 2022-05-26

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers

From: Alexander Egorenkov <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-19 07:40:07
Also in: bpf, netfilter-devel

Hi Kartikeya,

sorry if i wasn't clear in my first message but just to be sure
we have no misunderstandings :)

.BTF sections work on s390x with linux-next and nf_conntrack as well if
the corresponding .BTF section is a part of the kernel module itself.
I tested it myself by building a linux-next kernel and testing it with a
KVM guest, i'm able to load nf_conntrack and it works.

In contrast, in the case where the corresponding .BTF section is separate
from the kernel module nf_conntrack, it fails with the message i
provided in the first email.

Therefore, my question is, does BTF for kernel modules work if the
corresponding BTF section is NOT a part of the kernel module but instead
is stored within the corresponding debuginfo file
/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/*/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.ko.debug ?

Thanks
Regards
Alex


 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help