Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-02-18 22:20:23
Also in:
bpf, netfilter-devel
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 01:49:04AM IST, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
Hi, we are having a problem loading nf_conntrack on linux-next: # modprobe nf_conntrack modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nf_conntrack': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) modprobe: ERROR: Error running install command '/sbin/modprobe --ignore-install nf_conntrack && /sbin/sysctl --quiet --pattern 'net[.]netfilter[.]nf_conntrack.*' --system' for module nf_conntrack: retcode 1 modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nf_conntrack': Invalid argument # dmesg [ 3728.188969] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3748.208674] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3748.567123] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3873.597276] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3874.017125] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3882.637097] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3883.507213] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs [ 3883.876878] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs # zgrep BTF /proc/config.gz CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y CONFIG_PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF=y CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES=y It seems that nf_conntrack.ko is missing a .BTF section which is present in debuginfo within /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/*/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.ko.debug instead. Am i correct in assuming that this is not supported (yet) ? We use pahole 1.22 and build linux-next on Fedora 35 as a set of custom packages. Architecture is s390x.
+Cc Ilya
Thanks for the report, Alex.
My assumption was that if DEBUG_INFO_BTF options was enabled, and BTF was not
present, it is a problem, but it seems it can happen even when the options are
enabled.
I guess if .BTF section isn't supported/emitted on s390x, we have to relax the
error and print a warning and ignore it, but I am not sure. Ilya would probably
know the current status.
We have already relaxed it once in (bpf-next):
c446fdacb10d ("bpf: fix register_btf_kfunc_id_set for !CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF")
If this doesn't work on s390x, we should probably just print a warning when
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled and btf == NULL, and return 0.
Thanks Regards Alex
-- Kartikeya