Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 3 authors, 2022-02-18

Re: [PATCH 5/9] lib/ref_tracker: improve allocation flags

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2022-02-18 13:05:47
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:28 AM Andrzej Hajda [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
git log --oneline 5740d0689096..4d449bdc5b26 --no-merges -- lib/ref_tracker.c
c2d1e3df4af59261777b39c2e47476acd4d1cbeb ref_tracker: remove
filter_irq_stacks() call
8fd5522f44dcd7f05454ddc4f16d0f821b676cd9 ref_tracker: add a count of
untracked references
e3ececfe668facd87d920b608349a32607060e66 ref_tracker: implement
use-after-free detection

So I will cherry-pick these patches into next version of patchset, with
"NO MERGE" annotation (to allow testing), and if my ref_track patches
will be accepted then they can go via net-dev tree and intel patches
will wait till update of drm-tip.
Is this scenario OK?
One possibility would be to split your patch series in two, to merge
the ref_tracker changes directly in net-next asap.

But I have no strong opinion, maybe Jakub/David have some guidance.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help