Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 3 authors, 2022-02-18

Re: [PATCH 5/9] lib/ref_tracker: improve allocation flags

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2022-02-17 15:13:32
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 6:05 AM Andrzej Hajda [off-list ref] wrote:
Library can be called in non-sleeping context, so it should not use
__GFP_NOFAIL. Instead it should calmly handle allocation fails, for
this __GFP_NOWARN has been added as well.
Your commit changelog is misleading .

The GFP_NOFAIL issue has been fixed already in
commit c12837d1bb31032bead9060dec99ef310d5b9fb7 ("ref_tracker: use
__GFP_NOFAIL more carefully")

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
---
 lib/ref_tracker.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ref_tracker.c b/lib/ref_tracker.c
index 7b00bca300043..c8441ffbb058a 100644
--- a/lib/ref_tracker.c
+++ b/lib/ref_tracker.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ __ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
        if (list_empty(&dir->list))
                return;

-       sbuf = kmalloc(STACK_BUF_SIZE, GFP_NOWAIT);
+       sbuf = kmalloc(STACK_BUF_SIZE, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
This belongs to patch 3 in your series.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
        list_for_each_entry(tracker, &dir->list, head)
                ++total;
@@ -154,11 +154,11 @@ int ref_tracker_alloc(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
        unsigned long entries[REF_TRACKER_STACK_ENTRIES];
        struct ref_tracker *tracker;
        unsigned int nr_entries;
-       gfp_t gfp_mask = gfp;
Simply change this line to : gfp_t gfp_mask = gfp | __GFP_NOFAIL;
+       gfp_t gfp_mask;
        unsigned long flags;
Then leave all this code as is ? I find current code more readable.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-       if (gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)
-               gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
+       gfp |= __GFP_NOWARN;
+       gfp_mask = (gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) ? (gfp | __GFP_NOFAIL) : gfp;
        *trackerp = tracker = kzalloc(sizeof(*tracker), gfp_mask);
        if (unlikely(!tracker)) {
                pr_err_once("memory allocation failure, unreliable refcount tracker.\n");
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ int ref_tracker_free(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
        }
        nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 1);
        nr_entries = filter_irq_stacks(entries, nr_entries);
lib/ref_tracker.c got patches in net-next, your patch series is going
to add conflicts.

git log --oneline 5740d0689096..4d449bdc5b26 --no-merges -- lib/ref_tracker.c
c2d1e3df4af59261777b39c2e47476acd4d1cbeb ref_tracker: remove
filter_irq_stacks() call
8fd5522f44dcd7f05454ddc4f16d0f821b676cd9 ref_tracker: add a count of
untracked references
e3ececfe668facd87d920b608349a32607060e66 ref_tracker: implement
use-after-free detection

-       stack_handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_ATOMIC);
+       stack_handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries,
+                                       GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
This is fine.
        spin_lock_irqsave(&dir->lock, flags);
        if (tracker->dead) {
--
2.25.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help