Re: [RFC bpf-next 1/2] net: bridge: add unstable br_fdb_find_port_from_ifindex helper
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-01-26 12:05:40
Also in:
bpf
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-01-26 12:05:40
Also in:
bpf
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:12:15PM IST, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
quoted
[ snip to focus on the API ]quoted
+int br_fdb_find_port_from_ifindex(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx, + struct bpf_fdb_lookup *opt, + u32 opt__sz) +{ + struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx; + struct net_bridge_port *port; + struct net_device *dev; + int ret = -ENODEV; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_fdb_lookup) != NF_BPF_FDB_OPTS_SZ); + if (!opt || opt__sz != sizeof(struct bpf_fdb_lookup)) + return -ENODEV;Why is the BUILD_BUG_ON needed? Or why is the NF_BPF_FDB_OPTS_SZ constant even needed?I added it to be symmetric with respect to ct counterpart
But the constant needs to be an enum, not a define, otherwise it will not be emitted to BTF, I added it so that one could easily check the struct 'version' (because sizeof is not relocated in BPF programs). Yes, bpf_core_field_exists and would also work, but the size is fixed anyway and we need to check it, so it felt better to give it a name and also make it visible to BPF programs at the same time.
[...]
-- Kartikeya