Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-01

RE: [PATCH bpf v2 2/4] bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie

From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-01-25 08:37:32
Also in: bpf

Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie looks at the IP version in the IP header and
validates the address family of the socket. It supports IPv4 packets in
AF_INET6 dual-stack sockets.

On the other hand, bpf_tcp_check_syncookie looks only at the address
family of the socket, ignoring the real IP version in headers, and
validates only the packet size. This implementation has some drawbacks:

1. Packets are not validated properly, allowing a BPF program to trick
   bpf_tcp_check_syncookie into handling an IPv6 packet on an IPv4
   socket.
These programs are all CAP_NET_ADMIN I believe so not so sure this is
critical from a BPF program might trick the helper, but consistency
is nice.
2. Dual-stack sockets fail the checks on IPv4 packets. IPv4 clients end
   up receiving a SYNACK with the cookie, but the following ACK gets
   dropped.
Agree we need to fix this. Also would be nice to add a test to capture
this case so we don't break it again later. Its a bit subtle so might
not be caught right away without a selftest.
This patch fixes these issues by changing the checks in
bpf_tcp_check_syncookie to match the ones in bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie. IP
version from the header is taken into account, and it is validated
properly with address family.
Code looks good, would be nice to have a test.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Fixes: 399040847084 ("bpf: add helper to check for a valid SYN cookie")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help