On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 6:45 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
[off-list ref] wrote:

[...]

quoted

Eelco Chaudron (3):
  bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
  bpf: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers
  bpf: selftests: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include
    multi-buffer

Lorenzo Bianconi (19):
  net: skbuff: add size metadata to skb_shared_info for xdp
  xdp: introduce flags field in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
  net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
  net: mvneta: simplify mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment management
  net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine
  net: marvell: rely on xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine
  xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
  net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
  bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_MB flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf
    program
  net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames if the loaded XDP program support mb
  bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper
  bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
  bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
  bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish
    signature
  libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp_mb programs
  net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine
  bpf: selftests: introduce bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes selftest
  bpf: selftests: add CPUMAP/DEVMAP selftests for xdp multi-buff
  xdp: disable XDP_REDIRECT for xdp multi-buff

Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen (1):
  bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check

Hi Alexei and Daniel,

I noticed this series's state is now set to "New, archived" in patchwork.
Is it due to conflicts? Do I need to repost?

I believe Daniel had some comments, but please repost anyway.
The fresh rebase will be easier to review.