[off-list ref] writes:

On 23/12/21 06:44, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:

quoted

EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
know the content is safe

OK, so I'm nervous about such a large patch series, but it took a lot
of work to break things down into atomic changes.  This should be it
for the transmit path as far as I'm concerned.

Thanks David for the efforts to break down the changes. I am still 
reviewing and testing the previous series and found some inconsistent 
results. I am not sure about the cause of the difference. For some 
tests, the throughput is improved(~1Mbps) but for some CI tests, the 
throughput is less compared(~1Mbps in same range) to the previous. 
Though not observed much difference.

Now the new patches are added to the same series so it is difficult to 
review them in one go.

I have a request, incase there are new patches please include them in 
separate series. Breaking down the patch helps to identify the non 
related changes which can go in separate series. The patches(change) may 
be related to TX path flow but can go in separate series.

Yeah, a thumb of rule is to have around 10-12 patches per patchset. Then
it's still pretty easy to review them and get them accepted. Of course
it's not a hard rule, for smaller patches (like here) having more than
12 is still doable. An also the opposite, with big patches even 10
patches is too much. But 50 patches is just pure pain for the reviewers :)

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches