Thread (55 messages) 55 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-28

Re: [PATCH v2 00/50] wilc1000: rework tx path to use sk_buffs throughout

From: David Mosberger-Tang <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-23 15:24:15
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 06:16 +0000, Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com wrote:
On 23/12/21 06:44, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
quoted
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

OK, so I'm nervous about such a large patch series, but it took a lot
of work to break things down into atomic changes.  This should be it
for the transmit path as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks David for the efforts to break down the changes. I am still 
reviewing and testing the previous series and found some inconsistent 
results. I am not sure about the cause of the difference. For some 
tests, the throughput is improved(~1Mbps) but for some CI tests, the 
throughput is less compared(~1Mbps in same range) to the previous. 
Though not observed much difference.
There shouldn't be any significant performance regressions.  From my
observations, +/-1Mbps in throughput is quite possible due to cache-
effects.
Now the new patches are added to the same series so it is difficult to 
review them in one go.
Ah, OK, sorry about that.  After the automated error reports, I waited
for a day or two and after not seeing any further feedback, I figured
it'd be fine to add to the series.

I take it that as long as a patch shows up in patchworks with a
state==Action required, I should assume the patch is being worked on
(or will be worked on).
I have a request, incase there are new patches please include them in 
separate series.
I'm not planning on adding more patches.

  --david

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help