Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next] net: Preserve skb delivery time during forward
flat view
From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-17 17:57:32
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:13:14PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 12/17/21 8:33 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:quoted
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:42:30AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:quoted
On 12/16/21 11:58 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -530,7 +538,14 @@ struct skb_shared_info { /* Warning: this field is not always filled in (UFO)! */ unsigned short gso_segs; struct sk_buff *frag_list; - struct skb_shared_hwtstamps hwtstamps; + union { + /* If SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP is set in tx_flags, + * tx_delivery_tstamp is stored instead of + * hwtstamps. + */Should we just encode the timebase and/or type { timestamp, delivery_time } in th lower bits of the timestamp field? Its resolution is higher than actual clock precision.In skb->tstamp ?Yes. Arguably a hack, but those bits are in the noise now, and it avoids the clone issue with skb_shinfo (and scarcity of flag bits there).quoted
quoted
is non-zero skb->tstamp test not sufficient, instead of SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD. It is if only called on the egress path. Is bpf on ingress the only reason for this?Ah. ic. meaning testing non-zero skb->tstamp and then call skb_save_delivery_time() only during the veth-egress-path: somewhere in veth_xmit() => veth_forward_skb() but before skb->tstamp was reset to 0 in __dev_forward_skb().Right. If delivery_time is the only use of skb->tstamp on egress, and timestamp is the only use on ingress, then the only time the delivery_time needs to be cached if when looping from egress to ingress and this field is non-zero.quoted
Keep *_forward() and bpf_out_*() unchanged (i.e. keep skb->tstamp = 0) because the skb->tstamp could be stamped by net_timestamp_check(). Then SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD is not needed. Did I understand your suggestion correctly?I think so. But the reality is complicated if something may be setting a delivery time on ingress (a BPF filter?)I'm not quite following the 'bpf_out_*() unchanged (i.e. keep skb->tstamp = 0)' part yet; in our case we would need to preserve it as well, for example, we are redirecting via bpf from bpf@tc-ingress@host-veth to bpf@tc-egress@phys-dev in the egress path and fq sits on phys-dev.. (I mean if needed we could easily do that as shown in my prev diff with a flag for the helper).Right, we have the same use case: redirecting from bpf@tc-ingress@host-veth to bpf@tc-egress@phys-dev in the egress path and fq sits on phys-dev My earlier comment was on having the delivery_time preserved in the skb_shared_hwtstamps. The delivery_time (e.g. EDT) and timestamp (timestamp as RX timestamp) are separately stored when looping from veth-egress to veth-ingress: delivery_time in skb_shared_hwtstamps rx timestamp in skb->tstamp Thus, when bpf_redirect_neigh(phys-dev) happens, bpf_out_*() can continue to reset skb->tstamp as-is while delivery_time will automatically be kept in skb_shared_hwtstamps. When the skb reaches the egress@phys-dev (__dev_queue_xmit), the delivery_time in skb_shared_hwtstamps will be restored into skb->tstamp (done in skb_restore_delivery_time in this patch).I think that could probably work, also in particular if it's restored once on stacked devs e.g. when instead of phys-dev we're dealing with upper tunnel dev (e.g. vxlan/geneve + BPF with collect_md). Wouldn't we still need something like SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD, e.g. when the phys driver sets skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp on RX, and this gets carried on the ingress path to the target namespaces' socket?
In the opposite direction phys-dev => host-veth => netns-veth, the phys driver can set the hwtstamp but it won't set the SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP. This hwstamp gets carried onto the ingress path of the target namesapce which I think is the current behavior also ? From phys-dev => host-veth, the skb is forwarded and its skb->tstamp reset to 0. veth_xmit() won't save zero skb->tstamp into hwstamp and SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP won't be set also.