Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next] net: Preserve skb delivery time during forward
flat view
From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-16 22:23:55
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:32:23AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: [ ... ]
quoted
(c: skb->tstamp = 0) vv tcp-sender => veth@netns => veth@hostns(b: rx: skb->tstamp = real_clock) => fq@eth0 ^^ (a: skb->tstamp = 0) (a) veth@netns TX to veth@hostns: skb->tstamp (mono clock) is a EDT and it is in future time. Reset to 0 so that it won't skip the net_timestamp_check at the RX side in (b). (b) RX (netif_rx) in veth@hostns: net_timestamp_check puts a current time (real clock) in skb->tstamp. (c) veth@hostns forward to fq@eth0: skb->tstamp is reset back to 0 again because fq is using mono clock. This leads to an unstable TCP throughput issue described by Daniel in [0]. We also have a use case that a bpf runs at ingress@veth@hostns to set EDT in skb->tstamp to limit the bandwidth usage of a particular netns. This EDT currently also gets reset in step (c) as described above.
[ ... ]
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index 6535294f6a48..9bf0a1e2a1bd 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h@@ -435,9 +435,17 @@ enum { /* device driver is going to provide hardware time stamp */ SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS = 1 << 2, + /* shinfo stores a future tx_delivery_tstamp instead of hwtstamps */ + SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP = 1 << 3, + /* generate wifi status information (where possible) */ SKBTX_WIFI_STATUS = 1 << 4, + /* skb->tstamp stored a future delivery time which + * was set by a local sk and it can be fowarded. + */ + SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD = 1 << 5, + /* generate software time stamp when entering packet scheduling */ SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP = 1 << 6, };@@ -530,7 +538,14 @@ struct skb_shared_info { /* Warning: this field is not always filled in (UFO)! */ unsigned short gso_segs; struct sk_buff *frag_list; - struct skb_shared_hwtstamps hwtstamps; + union { + /* If SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP is set in tx_flags, + * tx_delivery_tstamp is stored instead of + * hwtstamps. + */Should we just encode the timebase and/or type { timestamp, delivery_time } in th lower bits of the timestamp field? Its resolution is higher than actual clock precision.
In skb->tstamp ?
quoted
+ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps hwtstamps; + u64 tx_delivery_tstamp; + }; unsigned int gso_type; u32 tskey;@@ -1463,9 +1478,44 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_end_offset(const struct sk_buff *skb) static inline struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *skb_hwtstamps(struct sk_buff *skb) { + if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP)) { + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags &= ~SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_delivery_tstamp = 0; + } return &skb_shinfo(skb)->hwtstamps; } +/* Caller only needs to read the hwtstamps as ktime. + * To update hwtstamps, HW device driver should call the writable + * version skb_hwtstamps() that returns a pointer. + */ +static inline ktime_t skb_hwtstamps_ktime(const struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP)) + return 0; + return skb_shinfo(skb)->hwtstamps.hwtstamp; +} + +static inline void skb_scrub_tstamp(struct sk_buff *skb)skb_save_delivery_time?
yep. ok.
is non-zero skb->tstamp test not sufficient, instead of SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD. It is if only called on the egress path. Is bpf on ingress the only reason for this?
Ah. ic. meaning testing non-zero skb->tstamp and then call skb_save_delivery_time() only during the veth-egress-path: somewhere in veth_xmit() => veth_forward_skb() but before skb->tstamp was reset to 0 in __dev_forward_skb(). Keep *_forward() and bpf_out_*() unchanged (i.e. keep skb->tstamp = 0) because the skb->tstamp could be stamped by net_timestamp_check(). Then SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD is not needed. Did I understand your suggestion correctly? However, we still need a bit to distinguish tx_delivery_tstamp from hwtstamps.
quoted
+{ + if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD) { + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_delivery_tstamp = skb->tstamp; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags &= ~SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD; + }Is this only called when there are no clones/shares?
No, I don't think so. TCP clone it. I also started thinking about this after noticing a mistake in the change in __tcp_transmit_skb(). There are other places that change tx_flags, e.g. tcp_offload.c. It is not shared at those places or there is some specific points in the stack that is safe to change ?
quoted
+ skb->tstamp = 0; +} + +static inline void skb_restore_delivery_time(struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP)) { + skb->tstamp = skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_delivery_tstamp; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_delivery_tstamp = 0; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags &= ~SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP; + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_DELIVERY_TSTAMP_ALLOW_FWD; + } +} + static inline struct ubuf_info *skb_zcopy(struct sk_buff *skb) { bool is_zcopy = skb && skb_shinfo(skb)->flags & SKBFL_ZEROCOPY_ENABLE;diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c index ec646656dbf1..a3ba6195f2e3 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_dev_queue_push_xmit); int br_forward_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { - skb->tstamp = 0; + skb_scrub_tstamp(skb); return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_POST_ROUTING, net, sk, skb, NULL, skb->dev, br_dev_queue_push_xmit);diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index a855e41bbe39..e9e7de758cba 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c