Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 5/5] net: wwan: core: make debugfs optional
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-28 23:47:30
Add Leon to CC to merge both conversations. On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 8:01 PM Johannes Berg [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 15:55 +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:quoted
+config WWAN_DEBUGFS + bool "WWAN subsystem common debugfs interface" + depends on DEBUG_FS + help + Enables common debugfs infrastructure for WWAN devices. + + If unsure, say N.I wonder if that really should even say "If unsure, say N." because really, once you have DEBUG_FS enabled, you can expect things to show up there? And I'd probably even argue that it should be bool "..." if EXPERT default y depends on DEBUG_FS so most people aren't even bothered by the question?quoted
config WWAN_HWSIM tristate "Simulated WWAN device" help@@ -83,6 +91,7 @@ config IOSM config IOSM_DEBUGFS bool "IOSM Debugfs support" depends on IOSM && DEBUG_FS + select WWAN_DEBUGFSI guess it's kind of a philosophical question, but perhaps it would make more sense for that to be "depends on" (and then you can remove && DEBUG_FS"), since that way it becomes trivial to disable all of WWAN debugfs and not have to worry about individual driver settings? And after that change, I'd probably just make this one "def_bool y" instead of asking the user.
When I was preparing this series, my primary considered use case was embedded firmwares. For example, in OpenWrt, you can not completely disable debugfs, as a lot of wireless stuff can only be configured and monitored with the debugfs knobs. At the same time, reducing the size of a kernel and modules is an essential task in the world of embedded software. Disabling the WWAN and IOSM debugfs interfaces allows us to save 50K (x86-64 build) of space for module storage. Not much, but already considerable when you only have 16MB of storage. I personally like Johannes' suggestion to enable these symbols by default to avoid bothering PC users with such negligible things for them. One thing that makes me doubtful is whether we should hide the debugfs disabling option under the EXPERT. Or it would be an EXPERT option misuse, since the debugfs knobs existence themself does not affect regular WWAN device use. Leon, would it be Ok with you to add these options to the kernel configuration and enable them by default? -- Sergey