Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 2 authors, 2021-10-09

Re: [PATCH] tcp: md5: Fix overlap between vrf and non-vrf keys

From: Leonard Crestez <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-08 15:52:07
Also in: lkml

On 07.10.2021 21:27, David Ahern wrote:
On 10/7/21 12:41 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
quoted
On 07.10.2021 04:14, David Ahern wrote:
quoted
On 10/6/21 11:48 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
quoted
@@ -1103,11 +1116,11 @@ static struct tcp_md5sig_key
*tcp_md5_do_lookup_exact(const struct sock *sk,
   #endif
       hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &md5sig->head, node,
                    lockdep_sock_is_held(sk)) {
           if (key->family != family)
               continue;
-        if (key->l3index && key->l3index != l3index)
+        if (key->l3index != l3index)
That seems like the bug fix there. The L3 reference needs to match for
new key and existing key. I think the same change is needed in
__tcp_md5_do_lookup.
Current behavior is that keys added without tcpm_ifindex will match
connections both inside and outside VRFs. Changing this might break real
applications, is it really OK to claim that this behavior was a bug all
along?
no.

It's been a few years. I need to refresh on the logic and that is not
going to happen before this weekend.
It seems that always doing a strict key->l3index != l3index condition 
inside of __tcp_md5_do_lookup breaks the usecase of binding one listener 
to each VRF and not specifying the ifindex for each key.

This is a very valid usecase, maybe the most common way to use md5 with vrf.

Ways to fix this:
* Make this comparison only take effect if TCP_MD5SIG_FLAG_IFINDEX is set.
* Make this comparison only take effect if tcp_l3mdev_accept=1
* Add a new flag?

Right now passing TCP_MD5SIG_FLAG_IFINDEX and ifindex == 0 results in an 
error but maybe it should be accepted to mean "key applies only for 
default VRF".

--
Regards,
Leonard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help