Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 4/6] ethtool: extend ringparam setting uAPI with rx_buf_len

We think ethtool_ringparam_ext is more easy to understand it is extension of
struct ethtool_ringparam. However, we don't mind to keep the same way and modify
to the name kernel_ethtool_ringparam if everyone agrees.

Does anyone have other opinions?

What has been done most in the past? We should one way to do this, and
consistently use it everywhere in the network stack.

     Andrew