Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 3/6] ethtool: add support to set/get rx buf len via ethtool
From: huangguangbin (A) <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-14 06:24:32
Also in:
linux-s390
On 2021/10/13 2:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:41:24 +0800 Guangbin Huang wrote:quoted
From: Hao Chen <redacted> Add support to set rx buf len via ethtool -G parameter and get rx buf len via ethtool -g parameter. Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <redacted> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <redacted>quoted
+ ``ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_BUF_LEN`` u32 size of buffers on the ring ==================================== ====== ==========================Does the documentation build without warnings?
Hi Jakub, there is no warning when we build documentation. It seems that the third column needs more '=' symbol, we add it in next version.
quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h index 266e95e4fb33..83544186cbb5 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h@@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ struct ethtool_ringparam { __u32 tx_pending; }; +/** + * struct ethtool_ringparam_ext - RX/TX ring configuration + * @rx_buf_len: Current length of buffers on the rx ring. + */ +struct ethtool_ringparam_ext { + __u32 rx_buf_len; +};This can be moved to include/linux/ethtool.h, user space does not need to know about this structure.
Ok.
quoted
+ if (ringparam_ext.rx_buf_len != 0 && + !(ops->supported_ring_params & ETHTOOL_RING_USE_RX_BUF_LEN)) { + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_BUF_LEN], + "setting not supported rx buf len");"setting rx buf len not supported" sounds better
Ok.
quoted
+ goto out_ops; + } + ret = dev->ethtool_ops->set_ringparam(dev, &ringparam); if (ret < 0) goto out_ops;.