On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:59 PM Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

---
v2: Rebase on latest net-next
    Make the code more complete (but still incomplete)

What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored?

They are not ignored for two reasons:

1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly
you missed them.

Multiple people in the v1 thread made it clear that the approach
presented in v1 is not generic enough. v2 made no attempt to
address these concerns.