On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

---
v2: Rebase on latest net-next
    Make the code more complete (but still incomplete)

What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored?

They are not ignored for two reasons:

1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly
you missed them.

2) I also responded in changelog, please check the difference, clearly
V2 is much more lengthy than V1.

It becomes clear you ignored mine (either email or changelog), not
vice versa.

Please lead by examples, you are not actually following anything you
ask others to do. Remember the last time I asked you to expand your
changelog for bpf timer? You kept ignoring it. ;)

Thanks.