Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-25

Re: [PATCH net v2] napi: fix race inside napi_enable

From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2021-09-22 06:48:18

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:20:24 -0700, Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:52:32 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
quoted
The process will cause napi.state to contain NAPI_STATE_SCHED and
not in the poll_list, which will cause napi_disable() to get stuck.

The prefix "NAPI_STATE_" is removed in the figure below, and
NAPI_STATE_HASHED is ignored in napi.state.

                      CPU0       |                   CPU1       | napi.state
===============================================================================
napi_disable()                   |                              | SCHED | NPSVC
napi_enable()                    |                              |
{                                |                              |
    smp_mb__before_atomic();     |                              |
    clear_bit(SCHED, &n->state); |                              | NPSVC
                                 | napi_schedule_prep()         | SCHED | NPSVC
                                 | napi_poll()                  |
                                 |   napi_complete_done()       |
                                 |   {                          |
                                 |      if (n->state & (NPSVC | | (1)
                                 |               _BUSY_POLL)))  |
                                 |           return false;      |
                                 |     ................         |
                                 |   }                          | SCHED | NPSVC
                                 |                              |
    clear_bit(NPSVC, &n->state); |                              | SCHED
}                                |                              |
                                 |                              |
napi_schedule_prep()             |                              | SCHED | MISSED (2)

(1) Here return direct. Because of NAPI_STATE_NPSVC exists.
(2) NAPI_STATE_SCHED exists. So not add napi.poll_list to sd->poll_list

Since NAPI_STATE_SCHED already exists and napi is not in the
sd->poll_list queue, NAPI_STATE_SCHED cannot be cleared and will always
exist.

1. This will cause this queue to no longer receive packets.
2. If you encounter napi_disable under the protection of rtnl_lock, it
   will cause the entire rtnl_lock to be locked, affecting the overall
   system.

This patch uses cmpxchg to implement napi_enable(), which ensures that
there will be no race due to the separation of clear two bits.

Fixes: 2d8bff12699abc ("netpoll: Close race condition between poll_one_napi and napi_disable")
Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Why don't you just invert the order of clearing the bits:
I think it should be an atomic operation. The original two-step clear itself is
problematic. So from this perspective, it is not just a solution to this
problem.

Thanks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a796754f75cc..706eca8112c1 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6953,8 +6953,8 @@ void napi_enable(struct napi_struct *n)
 {
        BUG_ON(!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state));
        smp_mb__before_atomic();
-       clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state);
        clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state);
+       clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state);
        if (n->dev->threaded && n->thread)
                set_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &n->state);
 }
That's simpler and symmetric with the disable path.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help