Re: [PATCH] net: fix tp->undo_retrans accounting in tcp_sacktag_one()
From: zhenggy <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-10 02:20:36
Hi,Neal: Thanks very much for your checking, I will send a v2 patch to make it. 在 2021/9/9 21:38, Neal Cardwell 写道:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 6:34 AM zhenggy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Commit a71d77e6be1e ("tcp: fix segment accounting when DSACK range covers multiple segments") fix some DSACK accounting for multiple segments. In tcp_sacktag_one(), we should also use the actual DSACK rang(pcount) for tp->undo_retrans accounting. Signed-off-by: zhenggy <redacted> --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 3f7bd7a..141e85e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@ static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(struct sock *sk, if (dup_sack && (sacked & TCPCB_RETRANS)) { if (tp->undo_marker && tp->undo_retrans > 0 && after(end_seq, tp->undo_marker)) - tp->undo_retrans--; + tp->undo_retrans = max_t(int, 0, tp->undo_retrans - pcount); if ((sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED) && before(start_seq, state->reord)) state->reord = start_seq; --Thanks for the fix! I think it would be useful to have a Fixes: footer to help maintainers know how far back to backport the fix. I think an appropriate fixes footer might be the following: Fixes: 10d3be569243 ("tcp-tso: do not split TSO packets at retransmit time") Before that commit, the assumption underlying the tp->undo_retrans-- seems correct, AFAICT. thanks, neal