Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] ravb: Add struct ravb_hw_info to driver data
From: Sergey Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-20 18:16:01
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
On 8/19/21 8:33 PM, Biju Das wrote: [...]
quoted
quoted
The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP found on RZ/G2L SoC are similar to the R-Car Ethernet AVB IP. With a few changes in the driver we can support both IPs. This patch adds the struct ravb_hw_info to hold hw features, driver data and function pointers to support both the IPs. It also replaces the driver data chip type with struct ravb_hw_info by moving chip typeto it.quoted
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
[...]
quoted
quoted
reg) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index 94eb9136752d..b6554e5e13af 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c[...]quoted
@@ -2113,7 +2122,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
} } - priv->chip_id = chip_id; + priv->chip_id = info->chip_id;Do we still need priv->chip_id?The patch currently merged is preparation patch, subsequent patch will replace all the chip_id in ravb_main with hardware features and driver features. After that both priv->chip_id and info_chipid is not required for ravb_main.c However ptp driver[1] still uses it, by adding a feature bit we can replace that as well. So going forward, there won't be any priv->chip_id or info->chip_id. Does it makes sense? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c?h=v5.14-rc6#n200
OK, seems sane, go ahead. :-)
Regards, Biju
MBR, Sergey