Re: [PATCH V7 4/9] PCI: Enable 10-Bit Tag support for PCIe Endpoint devices
flat view
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-05 19:54:10
Also in:
linux-media, linux-pci
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 03:47:31PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:
Hi Bjorn Many thanks for your review. On 2021/8/5 7:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 09:47:03PM +0800, Dongdong Liu wrote:quoted
10-Bit Tag capability, introduced in PCIe-4.0 increases the total Tag field size from 8 bits to 10 bits. PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 "Considerations for Implementing 10-Bit Tag Capabilities" Implementation Note. For platforms where the RC supports 10-Bit Tag Completer capability, it is highly recommended for platform firmware or operating software that configures PCIe hierarchies to Set the 10-Bit Tag Requester Enable bit automatically in Endpoints with 10-Bit Tag Requester capability. This enables the important class of 10-Bit Tag capable adapters that send Memory Read Requests only to host memory.Quoted material should be set off with a blank line before it and indented by two spaces so it's clear exactly what comes from the spec and what you've added. For example, see https://git.kernel.org/linus/ec411e02b7a2Good point, will fix.quoted
We need to say why we assume it's safe to enable 10-bit tags for all devices below a Root Port that supports them. I think this has to do with switches being required to forward 10-bit tags correctly even if they were designed before 10-bit tags were added to the spec.PCIe spec 5.0 r1.0 section 2.2.6.2 "Considerations for Implementing 10-Bit Tag Capabilities" Implementation Note: Switches that lack 10-Bit Tag Completer capability are still able to forward NPRs and Completions carrying 10-Bit Tags correctly, since the two new Tag bits are in TLP Header bits that were formerly Reserved, and Switches are required to forward Reserved TLP Header bits without modification. However, if such a Switch detects an error with an NPR carrying a 10-Bit Tag, and that Switch handles the error by acting as the Completer for the NPR, the resulting Completion will have an invalid 10-Bit Tag. Thus, it is strongly recommended that Switches between any components using 10-Bit Tags support 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. Note that Switches supporting 16.0 GT/s data rates or greater must support 10-Bit Tag Completer capability. This patch also consider to enable 10-Bit Tag for EP device need RP and Switch device support 10-Bit Tag Completer capability.quoted
And it should call out any cases where it is *not* safe, e.g., if P2P traffic is an issue.Yes, indeed.quoted
If there are cases where we don't want to enable 10-bit tags, whether it's to enable P2P traffic or merely to work around device defects, that ability needs to be here from the beginning. If somebody needs to bisect with 10-bit tags disabled, we don't want a bisection hole between this commit and the commit that adds the control.We provide sysfs file to disable 10-bit tag for P2P traffic when needed. The details see PATCH 7/8/9.
A mechanism for avoiding problems needs to be present from the very beginning so there's no bisection hole. It should not be added by a future patch. The sysfs file is a start, but if we run into an issue, it could mean that we can't boot and run long enough to use sysfs to disable 10-bit tags. So I think we might need a kernel parameter that disables it (and possibly other things like MPS optimization).
Current we do not know the 10-bit tag defective devices, current may no need do as 8-bit tag does in quirk_no_ext_tags().